Top 7 Juro Alternatives for Contract Lifecycle Management

By Mariana Hagström
Avokaado Founder & CEO

Juro is a web-based contract management tool that brings drafting, approval, signing, and storage together in one place. Many legal and business teams like Juro for its simple interface and collaboration features, which help them avoid switching between different tools.

However, lately, teams have started looking for Juro alternatives. As contract volumes grow and workflows become more complex, it became clear that Juro was falling short. Some teams sought more automation. Others wanted better reporting, stronger integrations with enterprise systems, or smarter AI features than basic document management can offer.

In this article, we’ll cover some alternatives to Juro, each with its own approach to contract management. Whether you want AI tools that follow your playbooks, strong compliance controls, or just something simple for a small team, there are options here. These platforms help with common challenges like speeding up contract cycles, keeping processes on track, and extracting valuable data from your contracts.

Why Teams Seek Out Alternatives to Juro

Several operational needs and strategic goals are prompting legal and business teams to consider Juro alternatives. Here are some common reasons:

  1. Native integrations: Teams often explore alternatives for practical reasons, such as the need to integrate more deeply with their existing systems in the tech stack, including legacy systems, CRM platforms, procurement tools, and other key business systems.
  2. Workflow complexity: As organizations grow or operate in different regions, contract approval workflows can become more detailed. Many organizations need more precise control over routing logic or conditional approvals.
  3. AI governance and transparency: Legal teams look for platforms that follow clear rules for AI. They want to understand why changes are made and how each decision connects to a specific policy.
  4. Advanced analytics: Key contract data can provide valuable business insights, but teams need tools that allow them to report on contract performance, obligations, and risks.
  5. Scalability: Organizations that are growing quickly need platforms that continue to perform well as the number of documents and users increases.
  6. Industry-specific requirements: Certain industries have unique compliance, security, or workflow needs that standard platforms may not address.

A Head-to-Head Comparison of the Seven Best Juro Alternatives

Listed below is an in-depth, feature-level comparison of the seven alternatives to Juro.

Capability Avokaado Ironclad ContractWorks SpotDraft HyperStart Oneflow Adobe Sign
Contract DraftingYesYesLimitedYesYesYesNo
AI-Powered ReviewYesLimitedNoYesLimitedBeta in Enterprise PlanNo
Automated RedliningYesLimitedNoYesLimitedNoNo
Native E-SignatureYesNoYesLimitedYesYesYes
Contract RepositoryYesYesYesYesYesYesNo
Obligation TrackingYesYesLimitedYesLimitedLimitedNo
Contract IntelligenceYesLimitedNoLimitedNoNoNo
Custom Approval WorkflowsYesYesLimitedYesYesLimitedLimited
Self-Service ContractingYesYesNoYesYesYesNo
Conditional Logic TemplatesYesYesNoYesLimitedLimitedNo
Clause LibraryYesYesLimitedYesYesLimitedNo
CRM IntegrationYesYesLimitedYesYesYesYes
API AccessYesYesLimitedYesYesYesYes
Real-Time CollaborationYesYesLimitedYesYesYesNo
Advanced AnalyticsYesYesNoLimitedLimitedNoNo
Compliance Audit TrailYesYesLimitedYesLimitedLimitedYes
GDPR ComplianceYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
SOC 2 CertifiedYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Multi-Language SupportYesYesNoYesNoYesYes

1. Avokaado: Intuitive Contract Intelligence Platform

Avokaado CLM platform - Main dashboard view

Avokaado helps legal and business teams manage contracts more efficiently. It turns contracts into structured data, making it easier to automate tasks and keep track of agreements. With Avokaado, teams can draft, negotiate, sign, and store contracts in one place. Built-in clause libraries and templates help keep agreements consistent and compliant. This operational intelligence tool is easy to use, so teams can get started quickly without a long training process.

Main Features

  • Data Registry: A single place to store and organize all your contract details, including compensation, obligations, terms, and conditions.  
  • Counterparties Registry: Keep one profile for each contract partner, whether that's an employee, vendor, or customer, with all their contract info in one place.
  • Compliance Center: Automate policy enforcement and approvals, with audit logs to keep you covered for GDPR, DORA, and NIS2, and let compliance run in the background.
  • AI-Powered Data Extraction: Turn old contracts into searchable data, so you can find what you need fast.
  • Document Lifecycle Management: Automate everything from drafting to renewal, with digital signatures and version control built in.
  • Cross-Team Workflows: Legal, HR, Revenue, and Procurement teams can work together easily with workflows made for their needs.

Pros and Cons

Pros Cons
With a data-first setup, you get organized, reusable contract data right from the start, which is important for legal documents. You'll need to switch to digital contract processes and stop using MS Word for contracts.
Built-in compliance features automate approvals and audit reports, so you don't have to worry about compliance tasks. It's best suited for scale-ups with 100 to 10k employees, and might be more than smaller teams require.
A unified system eliminates the need for separate document management, such as SharePoint. Newer market entrant compared to legacy CLM vendors
OIP supports cross-team collaboration (Legal, Revenue, People, and Procurement) in one platform For pricing, you'll need to contact the sales team instead of signing up directly.

Reviews

Users choose Avokaado because it is quick to set up, easy to use, and lets you build complex contract logic without IT support. Legal operations teams say it helps them organize documents, automate routine work, and stay in control.

Avokaado CLM - User review with a 5 star rating

Some users note that getting the most out of the platform takes a significant upfront investment of time in building playbooks and workflows. This work pays off, but it is a big change for teams used to less formal processes. A few reviewers wanted more ready-made templates for their industries, but most found that the onboarding team helps set up playbooks and workflows as needed.

Best For

Avokaado is a good fit for mid-sized legal teams (5-30 people) in industries like BFSI, telecom, healthcare, and government that handle a lot of regulated contracts. It works well for Heads of Legal and Legal Operations Directors who want to scale without adding more staff, reduce fragmentation, and make legal a business partner instead of a bottleneck.

2. Ironclad: Enterprise-Grade CLM for Legal Teams

Ironclad CLM - Contract drafting and redlining

Ironclad is a contract lifecycle management platform designed to support digital transformation. It emphasizes workflow automation, self-service contract creation, and analytics that help organizations track contract performance. It lets business teams handle routine contracts with less need for legal input, while still giving legal teams the tools to oversee and manage governance.

Main Features

  • Easily create contracts using flexible templates that adjust to your needs.
  • Set up custom workflows to manage approvals, contract negotiations, and escalations.
  • AI Assist for redlining of contracts and clause recommendations.
  • Connect easily with Salesforce, DocuSign, Slack, and other tools your team uses.
  • Track contract cycle times, spot bottlenecks, and monitor compliance with an analytics dashboard.

Pros and Cons

Pros Cons
Powerful workflow automation for approval routing The upfront investment is quite high, with small teams paying around $25,000 per year and enterprise plans costing over $100,000.
The AI-powered redlining feature helps reduce the amount of time spent on manual contract review. Setting up the system can be complex, and it often takes between three and six months to complete the implementation.
Good analytics for contract performance reporting There are additional costs for features like e-signature integrations, API access, and custom templates, which are not always clear upfront.
Established vendor with strong brand recognition The storage limits are not clearly defined and may need to be discussed during negotiations.

Reviews

Users appreciate Ironclad’s broad features and how it handles complex contract workflows for different departments. The analytics help legal teams show value and spot ways to improve. Enterprise customers value the onboarding support for higher-tier plans.

Ironclad user review

Best For

Ironclad is best for large enterprises with over $500 million in revenue and a dedicated legal operations team managing thousands of contracts each year. It suits organizations with the budget for premium CLM and the resources to support a 3 to 6-month implementation.

3. ContractWorks: Affordable Contract Management Platform

ContractWorks - Contract drafting features

ContractWorks focuses on straightforward contract management. Documents are its main focus. All plans include unlimited users and clear pricing. The interface is easy to use, especially for teams moving from spreadsheets or manual tracking.

Main Features

  • Store all your documents in one place, with OCR to make scanned agreements searchable.
  • Tag documents easily and add custom fields to organize your files the way you need.
  • Get reminders for renewals and key dates so you never miss an important milestone.
  • Electronic signature licenses are included.
  • Customize your reports and audit logs to fit your needs.

Pros and Cons

Pros Cons
Transparent, affordable pricing starting at $600–$700 per month Limited contract volumes are assigned to the lower tiers of the product
Unlimited users are included within the product price without per-seat pricing The ability to redline is only on the Premium plan at $2,000 per month
Strong tool for contract storage and basic lifecycle management Integration opportunities are limited compared to other enterprise CLM programs
Simple one-year contract commitment with an uncomplicated renewal process Not designed for higher complexity workflows or multi-party negotiations

Reviews

Users say the software is easy to use. Pricing is clear, and unlimited user access means it can be rolled out to a whole department without license concerns. Tagging and OCR features help organize legacy contracts and improve reporting. Customer support is rated highly for quick email responses.

ContractWorks user review

Best For

Best for basic to mid-tier contract management where teams are moving from spreadsheets or shared drives. Works well for teams that need simple pricing, unlimited user access, and a reliable document repository. Most useful for organizations handling routine, low-complexity contracts with predictable renewals.

4. SpotDraft: Modern CLM for Growing Legal Teams

SpotDraft - Contract repository view

SpotDraft is a contract management platform designed for rapidly growing organizations. It aims to make contract reviews faster, help teams work together more easily, and use AI to speed up the process, so legal teams can handle more work without needing to hire more people.

Main Features

  • The tool uses AI to review contracts and offers helpful suggestions for redlining and making changes.
  • You can access a template library with conditional logic and smart fields to draft contracts faster and more accurately.
  • Approval workflows can be set up to route contracts either in parallel or in sequence, depending on your process.
  • The system tracks your contract obligations and sends automated reminders for upcoming deadlines.

Pros and Cons

Pros Cons
The interface is modern and easy to use, so new users can get started quickly. Pricing depends on your organization's size and the features you need. You will need to contact sales for a quote.
The AI does a good job reviewing contracts and highlighting risks. Some users have noticed the system can slow down when handling a lot of contracts.
Teams can work together in real time to close agreements. Some advanced features are only available in higher pricing tiers.

Reviews

Users like that SpotDraft feels modern and is easy to use, especially compared to older CLM tools. Legal teams found that the AI review features made redlining contracts faster, but they could still control approvals. People also valued the real-time collaboration, which made it easier for legal, sales, and procurement to work together.

SpotDraft user review

Best For

Tech companies building out legal operations at scale, but not looking to hire more people, will find it useful. The platform is fast and makes it easy to work together, as long as you do not need to set up very complex workflows.

5. HyperStart: AI-First CLM for Fast Contract Turnaround

HyperStart CLM - Contract repository view

HyperStart was designed with AI at its core, with the goal of making it faster and easier to draft, negotiate, and close contracts. The platform focuses on shortening creation cycles by combining contract automation with straightforward self-service tools.

Main Features

  • The platform supports collaborative drafting and helps teams work through contract issues together.
  • Automated approval workflows and escalation rules are built in to keep contracts moving forward and avoid bottlenecks.
  • A contract analytics dashboard tracks cycle times and provides insights into the contract management process.
  • Integrates with Salesforce, HubSpot, and Google Workspace, and includes built-in e-signature features.

Pros and Cons

Pros Cons
HyperStart can be deployed quickly, often within one to two weeks. It offers fewer third-party integrations than some enterprise-focused products.
The AI-driven drafting features significantly reduce the time needed to create templates. The platform may not be as deep when handling very complex, multi-jurisdictional contract workflows.
HyperStart is focused on reducing contract cycle times. Its advanced analytics features are less robust than those found in more established enterprise CLM platforms.

Reviews

Users highlight how HyperStart's drafting tools help legal teams produce first drafts quickly, reducing the need for extensive editing. Small and mid-sized legal organizations appreciate the platform's focus on speed and simplicity over a large feature set. The modern interface also makes it easy for non-legal users to adopt and use self-service contract features.

HyperStart user review

Best For

Small and mid-size companies that prefer speedy and simple ways of doing things as opposed to more extensive experience and feature capabilities. Best suited for organizations seeking transparent pricing and rapid implementation instead of enterprise-quality customization.

6. Oneflow: Digital Contract Platform for Sales Teams

Oneflow CLM - Workspace with list of all contracts

Oneflow describes itself as a digital contract management software that replaces PDF and paper agreements. Their definition of contracting is interactive, web-based contracts that can be created, negotiated, signed, and managed all digitally.

Main Features

  • Ability to collaborate and negotiate on the contract live
  • Template builder with conditional content and smart fields
  • Integration capabilities with Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, and other CRMs
  • Automated reminders for actions and renewals in relation to the contract management

Pros and Cons

Pros Cons
Pricing is transparent, starting at €20 per user each month for the Essentials plan. Oneflow does not offer the same depth of CLM features as platforms built specifically for legal teams.
The interactive, web-based contracts offer a better user experience. Its repository and search features are basic compared to full enterprise CLM solutions.
Oneflow integrates well with CRMs for sales-focused workflows.

Reviews

Sales teams appreciate that Oneflow offers a modern, interactive contract experience instead of static PDFs. It is straightforward to learn and use, even for people without a technical background. The CRM integrations are reliable and let sales reps create and track contracts as part of their workflow.

Oneflow user review

Best For

Oneflow is a good fit for B2B SaaS companies and agencies with sales-driven workflows and simple commercial contracts. It is a solid choice for organizations moving away from PDF contracts and looking for a clear, affordable solution.

7. Adobe Sign: E-Signature Foundation for Contract Workflows

Adobe Sign - E signature tool

Adobe Sign, which used to be called Adobe EchoSign, is Adobe's main e-signature tool for businesses. It works by connecting with Adobe Acrobat and other contract management systems, so you can build contract workflows that fit into your existing setup. Adobe Sign itself isn't a full contract management platform. Instead, it acts as the signing piece for organizations that use Adobe's document tools or other contract management platforms.

Main Features

  • Legally binding digital signatures that comply with international standards (eIDAS, UETA, E-Sign Act)
  • Works within the product natively with Acrobat Pro to fill, edit, annotate, and provide contract reviews
  • Contract templates that allow signatures with a form field and signature blocks
  • Pre-built connects to Icertis, Contracts 365, Salesforce, Microsoft Dynamics, Oracle, and SAP
  • Audit trails for compliance, with audits approved with SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR compliance

Pros and Cons

Pros Cons
Best in class e-signature with an established brand trust Not a true CLM, requires pairing with a separate contract management system
Has above-average OCR capabilities to help digitize legacy contracts Not comparable to the native AI-Contract Intelligence platforms
Third-party integrations with all major CLMs and ERP systems Automation is not as rich as a dedicated CLM would be
Ability to ensure compliance across 190+ countries with 40+ languages Added cost for a separate license for the e-signatures that tie into CLMs

Reviews

Users say Adobe Sign is reliable and legally solid, and the well-known brand helps get signatures from outside parties without much hassle. Adobe Acrobat's editing and commenting tools work well with the signing process. Many organizations like the OCR capabilities for extracting data from old scanned contracts, which makes it easier to build a searchable archive.

Adobe Sign user review

Best For

Adobe Sign is a good fit if an organization already uses Adobe Acrobat for document workflows and needs a strong e-signature tool. It's also helpful for teams that need to digitize legacy contracts and turn them into searchable files.

Why Contract Intelligence Matters More Than Ever

The contract management landscape is changing fast. Many organizations that once just stored documents and collected electronic signatures now realize that contracts hold important business information like timelines, obligations, pricing, and compliance details, often hidden in unstructured text.

Top legal teams are moving from just managing documents to making better decisions. To do this, organizations need systems where contracts are more than files to sign. They need to be structured so AI tools can work with them in a reliable and measurable way.

If your organization needs a tool to turn contracts into organized data, automate routine tasks, and maintain consistency and compliance, consider how contract intelligence solutions can help your team work more efficiently. You can schedule a demo to see how the right contract management system could improve your workflow and give your legal team more time for strategic projects.

Get back in control

See how Avokaado replaces chaos with clarity by automating manual work, cutting delays, and giving you full visibility across every document.

Book a demo